AFFF: Understanding Its Effects on Health and Communities Near Military Bases

AFFF, or Aqueous Film-Forming Foam, has long been a staple in fire suppression efforts, particularly within military installations worldwide.

Recent revelations about AFFF’s composition and PFAS presence have raised concerns about its wider impact on health and the environment.

In this article, we delve into the multifaceted implications of AFFF. We explore its chemical makeup, associated health risks, and the disproportionate burden borne by communities residing near military bases.

AFFF Composition and its Use in Firefighting.

AFFF is a crucial firefighting tool comprising water, ethylene, and propylene glycol. Its application involves the spraying of a foam concentrate, which forms a film, effectively suffocating fires by cutting off their oxygen supply.

This foam is extensively utilized in military installations, particularly during scenarios involving fuel fires, owing to its proven efficacy. For more than fifty years, the Department of Defense has enforced the use of AFFF because of its exceptional firefighting properties.

However, the extensive dependence on AFFF has sparked worries regarding the existence of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). They are recognized for their detrimental impacts on health and the environment.

The Environmental Working Group (EWG) highlights suspicions of PFAS contamination in over 700 military locations across all 50 states. This underscores the urgency of understanding and addressing the broader implications of AFFF usage, especially in communities neighboring military bases.

PFAS Presence in AFFF and Associated Health Hazards.

PFAS are integral components of Aqueous Film-Forming Foam (AFFF), playing a vital role in its ability to suppress fires effectively. Yet, the incorporation of PFAS within AFFF has sparked notable apprehensions regarding their detrimental impact on health. PFAS compounds are infamous for their enduring presence in both the environment and the human body, resulting in their accumulation over time.

Exposure to PFAS has been associated with various health risks, such as immune system dysfunction, reproductive complications, cancer, and developmental delays in children. The widespread use of AFFF-containing PFAS compounds poses a substantial risk to both public health and environmental well-being.

Military Bases: Epicenter of PFAS Contamination.

Since the 1970s, military installations utilizing AFFF have unintentionally emerged as substantial contributors to PFAS pollution. These compounds have the potential to seep into groundwater sources, exacerbating environmental concerns.

JD Supra reported instances of economic harm due to groundwater contamination from PFAS. In New Mexico, a farmer faced significant hardships, compelled to discard 15,000 gallons of milk daily and ultimately cull his entire herd. These measures were necessitated by PFAS contamination stemming from a nearby Air Force base.

The presence of PFAS in AFFF poses health risks to military personnel and nearby communities sharing the same water sources. It underscores the urgent need for thorough environmental assessments and effective remediation measures to mitigate the spread of contamination.

Lawsuits and Litigation Surrounding AFFF.

AFFF contamination has led to a surge in lawsuits and legal actions against manufacturers and military entities. Plaintiffs, including both civilians and veterans, are seeking justice for health complications and environmental damage caused by PFAS exposure.

Veterans who encountered AFFF during their service played a crucial role in the litigation, shedding light on the extensive PFAS contamination within the military. Their involvement underscores the significant impact of PFAS exposure on military personnel and underscores the urgency of addressing these concerns.

During their service, veterans often encountered AFFF in firefighting drills, training exercises, and while combating fires on military bases. This exposure has put them at risk of PFAS-related health issues, including cancer, thyroid disorders, and immune system dysfunction. As a result, veterans are increasingly joining legal efforts to hold responsible parties accountable for their suffering.

TorHoerman Law states that both veterans and civilians impacted by AFFF contamination are seeking legal compensation for medical costs, lost earnings, and suffering. Lawsuits against manufacturers, suppliers, and military agencies aim to secure accountability and financial restitution for individuals and communities impacted by PFAS exposure.

Veterans can also explore VA claims for exposure to AFFF to seek benefits and healthcare services for PFAS-related illnesses. Filing VA claims grants veterans access to medical treatment, disability compensation, and support services for AFFF exposure during military service.

Environmental Fallout and Water Contamination.

The use of AFFF has led to significant environmental consequences, particularly regarding water contamination. PFAS chemicals present in AFFF have been found to leach into groundwater, posing risks to both the environment and public health. These substances endure in the environment for prolonged durations, complicating remedial endeavors.

The pollution of water reservoirs carries extensive repercussions for both ecosystems and human communities. Wildlife may suffer adverse effects from exposure to PFAS, while communities relying on contaminated water sources face health risks. Additionally, the migration of PFAS chemicals through groundwater can result in contamination of drinking water supplies, exacerbating the issue.

Efforts to mitigate water contamination caused by AFFF are crucial. Comprehensive environmental assessments and remediation strategies are needed to address existing contamination and prevent further spread. Additionally, regulations and policies must be implemented to limit the use of AFFF and minimize future environmental impacts.

Government Regulations and Industry Responses.

The presence of PFAS in AFFF has prompted increased government scrutiny and regulatory action. Authorities are taking steps to address the environmental and health risks associated with PFAS contamination. Regulations aimed at restricting the use of AFFF and mitigating its environmental impact are being considered and implemented at various levels of government.

Simultaneously, the industry is responding to mounting legal challenges and public concerns surrounding AFFF. Major manufacturers, such as 3M, are facing significant litigation related to AFFF contamination. However, there has been progress in addressing these concerns. Reuters reports that 3M has proposed a substantial payout of $10.3 billion to settle lawsuits attributing AFFF to water pollution. While pending, this settlement marks a notable advancement in AFFF litigation, highlighting increased accountability among industry stakeholders.

Frequently Asked Questions.

What is the Lawsuit Regarding Aqueous Firefighting Foam?

The lawsuit alleges that manufacturers of Aqueous Firefighting Foam (AFFF) have contaminated water sources with harmful PFAS chemicals. This has raised concerns about both health impacts and environmental damage.

What Symptoms Indicate Exposure to AFFF?

Symptoms of AFFF exposure may include nausea, allergic reactions, vomiting, abdominal pain, diarrhea, and headaches. Long-term exposure could lead to more severe health issues, including cancer and reproductive problems.

In conclusion, the widespread use of AFFF has inadvertently led to PFAS contamination, posing significant health and environmental risks to communities near military bases. Comprehensive action, comprising legal recourse, environmental remediation, and regulatory measures, is necessary to address these pressing concerns. Safeguarding public health and environmental integrity requires a concerted effort from various stakeholders.